Re: [227g31] Feature: EFF YEAH!
Posted: Wed Aug 25, 2010 2:43 pm
dots has done a really good job (well like always). UEd 2.1 is optimized for in the ed constructed static meshes. (smooth lighting for static meshes then). The UVs will also not getting screwed. Every test so far was very positive.
For those who want to look:
http://www.multiupload.com/8GCEW7Y9VC
SM was built in the ed, first it was impossible to light it, it kept dark, no matter what I tried. But exporting and reimporting fixed the issue since .. from what I understood, during import the surfaces will be re-calculated with the lighting stuff thingy.
I found the fern texture on a website (even in higher resolution and of course not ready with alpha).
@shadows:
http://www.abload.de/img/shadows0ohy.png
I would prefer to call them "BSP shadows", since they are calculated during lighting rebuild .. normally/so far only from brushes.
http://www.abload.de/img/shadowcastmovertruefr9l.png
This is how it was so far... mover like those in dig had those black tunnels, very annoying.
http://www.abload.de/img/shadowcastmoverfalseapoh.png
Looks better with disabled shadowcast, just needs to be rebuildet.
For those who want to look:
http://www.multiupload.com/8GCEW7Y9VC
SM was built in the ed, first it was impossible to light it, it kept dark, no matter what I tried. But exporting and reimporting fixed the issue since .. from what I understood, during import the surfaces will be re-calculated with the lighting stuff thingy.
I found the fern texture on a website (even in higher resolution and of course not ready with alpha).
@shadows:
http://www.abload.de/img/shadows0ohy.png
I would prefer to call them "BSP shadows", since they are calculated during lighting rebuild .. normally/so far only from brushes.
http://www.abload.de/img/shadowcastmovertruefr9l.png
This is how it was so far... mover like those in dig had those black tunnels, very annoying.
http://www.abload.de/img/shadowcastmoverfalseapoh.png
Looks better with disabled shadowcast, just needs to be rebuildet.