Page 2 of 2

Re: Why, Wikipedia, Why?

Posted: Tue Jan 26, 2010 4:14 pm
by Smirftsch
iirc then both wikipedia and beyondunreal are younger than Oldunreal...

Re: Why, Wikipedia, Why?

Posted: Tue Jan 26, 2010 6:18 pm
by Pravin
Just be like "whatever" about it. Wikipedia is headed by bureaucratic snobs, worse than dealing with fucking lawyers. I honestly think everyone here should just let it die already... at least until 227 (final) is finally released. Until then, everyone expending effort is merely wasting their time.

Re: Why, Wikipedia, Why?

Posted: Wed Jan 27, 2010 9:26 pm
by [§Ŕ] ŤhěxĐâŕkśîđěŕ
I agree with Pcube. I'm outta there. When the final is out I'll place it back and if they remove it again, that's their own no-life problem.

Re: Why, Wikipedia, Why?

Posted: Wed Feb 03, 2010 12:47 pm
by unregistered
ex member

Re: Why, Wikipedia, Why?

Posted: Thu Feb 04, 2010 12:29 pm
by TCP_Wolf
The thing is, we don't have proof that they have the source, so unless they post it... :\
227 is proof enough. Noone could make such a patch without source. Aside from that, screw wikipedia, if they don't want the real info then crappity smack em. Sorry had to rant some. :P
Actually, showing that written and signed NDA is proof just as well...

Re: Why, Wikipedia, Why?

Posted: Fri Mar 19, 2010 3:50 am
by unregistered
ex member

Re: Why, Wikipedia, Why?

Posted: Fri Mar 19, 2010 8:33 am
by Hyper
http://www.wikinfo.org/index.php/Main_Page Much smaller than wikipedia, but they allow articles where you are the original source itself.
That's a welcome alternative to Wikipedia yes. Original research is good.

Re: Why, Wikipedia, Why?

Posted: Sun Oct 24, 2010 7:37 pm
by Pitbull
Looks like wikipedia is messing with others now as well.

http://www.yabbforum.com/community/YaBB ... 1286567562