Page 1 of 1

Package "dusk" version mismatch? Oh, wai

Posted: Mon Aug 24, 2009 5:19 am
by KillerSkaarj
Oh god how did I not see it!? It wasn't complaining about Dusk.umx, it was complaining about DUSK.unr from the One Day map pack!!

Re: Package "dusk" version mismatch? Oh, wai

Posted: Mon Aug 24, 2009 5:52 am
by []KAOS[]Casey
thats fixed in 227g.. dont worry :P

new loader

Re: Package "dusk" version mismatch? Oh, wai

Posted: Mon Aug 24, 2009 1:15 pm
by Shivaxi
thats fixed in 227g.. dont worry :P

new loader
win

Re: Package "dusk" version mismatch? Oh, wai

Posted: Mon Aug 24, 2009 11:54 pm
by KillerSkaarj
thats fixed in 227g.. dont worry :P

new loader
Wait, seriously!?! EFF YEAH!!! YOU GUYS ARE THE BEST!! I already can't wait for 227g!

Re: Package "dusk" version mismatch? Oh, wai

Posted: Sun Aug 30, 2009 3:55 pm
by Skw
thats fixed in 227g.. dont worry :P

new loader
Wait, seriously!?! EFF YEAH!!! YOU GUYS ARE THE BEST!! I already can't wait for 227g!
R we already talking about 227g? When 227f (non-RC) will be out?

Re: Package "dusk" version mismatch? Oh, wai

Posted: Sun Aug 30, 2009 3:59 pm
by Gizzy
Why would you want a non-release candidate version of 227f?

Re: Package "dusk" version mismatch? Oh, wai

Posted: Sun Aug 30, 2009 7:08 pm
by Skw
Why would you want a non-release candidate version of 227f?
Because it's not final 227f. It's RC.

Like Windows 7 beta, Windows 7 RC, Windows 7 RTM and the final Windows 7 which can be bought from shops.

Of course it's not final 227 patch. I am just wondering when 227f gets over with RC stage.

Re: Package "dusk" version mismatch? Oh, wai

Posted: Sun Aug 30, 2009 7:13 pm
by KillerSkaarj
227f non-RC was already released, dude. That's why they're working on 227g. Because people found bugs in the already released 227f.

Get out from under that rock :P :D

Re: Package "dusk" version mismatch? Oh, wai

Posted: Sun Aug 30, 2009 9:40 pm
by Skw
227f non-RC was already released, dude. That's why they're working on 227g. Because people found bugs in the already released 227f.

Get out from under that rock :P :D
If that is so, Smir should update news immatedly. News are saying "This release is a release canditate!".

Re: Package "dusk" version mismatch? Oh, wai

Posted: Mon Aug 31, 2009 7:02 am
by GreatEmerald
227f is 227 RC, not 227f RC. 227g will also be a 227 RC, since we'll get RTNP support there and more bugs will be found.

Re: Package "dusk" version mismatch? Oh, wai

Posted: Mon Aug 31, 2009 8:11 am
by [§Ŕ] ŤhěxĐâŕkśîđěŕ
R we already talking about 227g? When 227f (non-RC) will be out?
There are only internal builds of every version, but once it's out, that's it, we go to the next one. :P

Re: Package "dusk" version mismatch? Oh, wai

Posted: Mon Aug 31, 2009 8:42 am
by []KAOS[]Casey
my only problem with settling on a "final" version is the "what if we find a crazy bug after we're done?"

bug lists can only get shorter one way though..

Re: Package "dusk" version mismatch? Oh, wai

Posted: Mon Aug 31, 2009 8:57 am
by [§Ŕ] ŤhěxĐâŕkśîđěŕ
what if we find a crazy bug after we're done?
Make a Last Second Saved fix? :P

Re: Package "dusk" version mismatch? Oh, wai

Posted: Mon Aug 31, 2009 12:04 pm
by Gizzy
since we'll get RTNP support there and more bugs will be found.
In 227g? Sweet.

Re: Package "dusk" version mismatch? Oh, wai

Posted: Mon Aug 31, 2009 8:31 pm
by Zombie
The new package loader would be great because unnecessary mismatches is an annoying engine flaw. Although it should have been implemented before 227f was declared a public RC or dropped if there will be 228 version development.
my only problem with settling on a "final" version is the "what if we find a crazy bug after we're done?"

bug lists can only get shorter one way though..
That is the purpose of a RC for the public. Even after a lengthy beta cycle with dedicated testers we move to RC as an extra safety. If the public does not discover "showstopper" bugs (obvious critical errors; broken features) within a few weeks then that same RC becomes final. The latest RC can just be re-titled as final.


-Zombie

Re: Package "dusk" version mismatch? Oh, wai

Posted: Mon Aug 31, 2009 8:36 pm
by []KAOS[]Casey
There actually is an engine.dll I can supply with this new loader for 227f, but it would break UnrealIntegrity for that client

Re: Package "dusk" version mismatch? Oh, wai

Posted: Mon Aug 31, 2009 8:45 pm
by Zombie
That means 227g will become RC2, and possibly final after a public trial period. ;)


-Zombie