Page 1 of 3
227f version release
Posted: Sun Nov 16, 2008 12:00 am
by [§Ŕ] ŤhěxĐâŕkśîđěŕ
I have a weird feeling of already posting this, it's even in my auto-complete entries in Firefox. Nah, I posted that at my own forum (lol).
Anyway, (I'll ask this mostly Smirf, but, oh well...), when is 227f going to be released?
Re: 227f version release
Posted: Sun Nov 16, 2008 2:01 am
by Shivaxi
soon 8-)
Re: 227f version release
Posted: Sun Nov 16, 2008 4:44 am
by []KAOS[]Casey
...
as soon as we fix everything we can, and finish what we have left to finish..
Re: 227f version release
Posted: Sun Nov 16, 2008 11:24 am
by Hyper
A (public) release candidate or 227f beta version would be nice. Some live real world testing and experiences never hurt a project. I can mirror it again if needed.
Re: 227f version release
Posted: Sun Nov 16, 2008 11:35 am
by [§Ŕ] ŤhěxĐâŕkśîđěŕ
Re: 227f version release
Posted: Sun Nov 16, 2008 12:41 pm
by Smirftsch
yeah, many especially small but time consuming things were fixed. Working on it, but currently small progress because many things to do in RL to take care about my health...
Re: 227f version release
Posted: Sun Nov 16, 2008 1:22 pm
by GreatEmerald
Why don't you just release F, then G, and leave the final as H? I mean, even if you release F as the "final", there will still be bugs. And you can't have 227f_fix36_beta_8-style names
Re: 227f version release
Posted: Sun Nov 16, 2008 2:03 pm
by [§Ŕ] ŤhěxĐâŕkśîđěŕ
228
Re: 227f version release
Posted: Sun Nov 16, 2008 3:32 pm
by Chaos13
Re: 227f version release
Posted: Sun Nov 16, 2008 4:21 pm
by GreatEmerald
228 = something new. 227f+fix can't be named 228.
Re: 227f version release
Posted: Sun Nov 16, 2008 6:09 pm
by []KAOS[]Casey
228 would break compat and have an epic ton of stuff added on.. better mutators and such, too sleepy to have an epic statement
but a 227f beta public release sounds like a good idea, but lol @ beta of beta..
Re: 227f version release
Posted: Sun Nov 16, 2008 6:23 pm
by Smirftsch
regarding the fact that it is a myth that "f" means final (check 224v for example...) I maybe just make a 227g if necessary.
Re: 227f version release
Posted: Sun Nov 16, 2008 9:31 pm
by [§Ŕ] ŤhěxĐâŕkśîđěŕ
W/e. It can be even 227zzz if you ask me.
Lol 227zzz.
Re: 227f version release
Posted: Sun Nov 16, 2008 9:49 pm
by Shivaxi
Re: 227f version release
Posted: Sun Nov 16, 2008 9:56 pm
by [§Ŕ] ŤhěxĐâŕkśîđěŕ
Just to ask, why would 228 be so bad? :-?
Re: 227f version release
Posted: Mon Nov 17, 2008 12:59 am
by []KAOS[]Casey
I always thought the "f" meant "final" as in the final revision of said version, not of the updates themselvse
and 228 won't be bad, it just will be very far :p
Re: 227f version release
Posted: Mon Nov 17, 2008 12:44 pm
by [§Ŕ] ŤhěxĐâŕkśîđěŕ
What about 300 then? ;P
Re: 227f version release
Posted: Mon Nov 17, 2008 12:56 pm
by GreatEmerald
300 is UT99, it's reserved.
Re: 227f version release
Posted: Mon Nov 17, 2008 3:58 pm
by [§Ŕ] ŤhěxĐâŕkśîđěŕ
UT1 doesn't have < 300?
Re: 227f version release
Posted: Mon Nov 17, 2008 5:27 pm
by GreatEmerald
According to LA, they don't. UT builds are 338-436.
Re: 227f version release
Posted: Mon Nov 17, 2008 5:38 pm
by [§Ŕ] ŤhěxĐâŕkśîđěŕ
According to LA, they don't. UT builds are 338-436.
That's silly!
Re: 227f version release
Posted: Mon Nov 17, 2008 5:48 pm
by §tå£kër 3000
A (public) release candidate or 227f beta version would be nice. Some live real world testing and experiences never hurt a project. I can mirror it again if needed.
I think Hyper has a very good Idea here.
I agree
Re: 227f version release
Posted: Mon Nov 17, 2008 7:08 pm
by [§Ŕ] ŤhěxĐâŕkśîđěŕ
I wanna test 227f. ;P
Re: 227f version release
Posted: Mon Nov 17, 2008 8:19 pm
by Smirftsch
folks, i swear, I do as fast as my health allows me, its almost done.
Re: 227f version release
Posted: Mon Nov 17, 2008 8:39 pm
by Jâçkrâßßit
where is the option that says "stfu and let these guys do their work"
