For direct access use https://forums.oldunreal.com
It's been quite a while since oldunreal had an overhaul, but we are moving to another server which require some updates and changes. The biggest change is the migration of our old reliable YaBB forum to phpBB. This system expects you to login with your username and old password known from YaBB.
If you experience any problems there is also the usual "password forgotten" function. Don't forget to clear your browser cache!
If you have any further concerns feel free to contact me: Smirftsch@oldunreal.com
It's been quite a while since oldunreal had an overhaul, but we are moving to another server which require some updates and changes. The biggest change is the migration of our old reliable YaBB forum to phpBB. This system expects you to login with your username and old password known from YaBB.
If you experience any problems there is also the usual "password forgotten" function. Don't forget to clear your browser cache!
If you have any further concerns feel free to contact me: Smirftsch@oldunreal.com
Semi public release of 227j
- Leo T_C_K
- OldUnreal Member
- Posts: 3673
- Joined: Sat Aug 27, 2005 6:24 pm
Re: Semi public release of 227j
As far as I understood it, there's not going to be another release anymore, just will go straight into 228k instead. Er..227k lol. Wonder why it didn't get a number increase already though since the changes got so heavy lately.
- Smirftsch
- Administrator
- Posts: 8999
- Joined: Wed Apr 29, 1998 10:00 pm
- Location: NaPali
- Contact:
Re: Semi public release of 227j
yes, my health wasn't the very best in between, so the "hotfix" release of 227k as big public official is not that "hot" anymore now...
But a lot of things have been fixed meanwhile even without me being very active and I am on it again for some time now too
But a lot of things have been fixed meanwhile even without me being very active and I am on it again for some time now too
Sometimes you have to lose a fight to win the war.
- tlk
- OldUnreal Member
- Posts: 64
- Joined: Fri May 08, 2020 6:24 am
Re: Semi public release of 227j
stay healthy manSmirftsch wrote: ↑Thu Dec 08, 2022 5:53 am yes, my health wasn't the very best in between, so the "hotfix" release of 227k as big public official is not that "hot" anymore now...
But a lot of things have been fixed meanwhile even without me being very active and I am on it again for some time now too
lots of people appreciate what you do
- BIr4
- OldUnreal Member
- Posts: 51
- Joined: Sat May 23, 2020 1:42 am
Re: Semi public release of 227j
Yeah. And make your best.
-
- Posts: 2
- Joined: Mon Dec 12, 2022 8:48 pm
Re: Semi public release of 227j
I can't launch OldUnreal227j. I get this error message
WARNING: Not using preference directory
Forcing CPU affinity disabled.
Caught a C++ exception in main()!
Aborting.
Can't find file for package ALAudio.
History: UObject::SafeLoadError <- UObject::StaticLoadClass <- UEngine::InitAudio <- UGameEngine::Init <- InitEngine
UObject::SafeLoadError
<- UObject::StaticLoadClass
<- UEngine::InitAudio
<- UGameEngine::Init
<- InitEngine
Exiting due to error
WARNING: Not using preference directory
Forcing CPU affinity disabled.
Caught a C++ exception in main()!
Aborting.
Can't find file for package ALAudio.
History: UObject::SafeLoadError <- UObject::StaticLoadClass <- UEngine::InitAudio <- UGameEngine::Init <- InitEngine
UObject::SafeLoadError
<- UObject::StaticLoadClass
<- UEngine::InitAudio
<- UGameEngine::Init
<- InitEngine
Exiting due to error
-
- Posts: 2
- Joined: Mon Dec 12, 2022 8:48 pm
Re: Semi public release of 227j
I got it working. I needed libxmp4.
- lowenz
- OldUnreal Member
- Posts: 338
- Joined: Fri Dec 28, 2007 9:31 am
- Hyper
- OldUnreal Member
- Posts: 3514
- Joined: Fri Oct 11, 2002 5:41 pm
- Contact:
Re: Semi public release of 227j
↕
Smirftsch wrote: ↑Thu Dec 08, 2022 5:53 am yes, my health wasn't the very best in between, so the "hotfix" release of 227k as big public official is not that "hot" anymore now...
But a lot of things have been fixed meanwhile even without me being very active and I am on it again for some time now too
- lowenz
- OldUnreal Member
- Posts: 338
- Joined: Fri Dec 28, 2007 9:31 am
Re: Semi public release of 227j
Question was another one: why the *REPO* is not updated, not "why the patch is not packaged" in a convenient form (not important for us testers)
- Hyper
- OldUnreal Member
- Posts: 3514
- Joined: Fri Oct 11, 2002 5:41 pm
- Contact:
Re: Semi public release of 227j
It's probably related but I'll leave it to Smirftsch to fill in the details.
-
- Posts: 1
- Joined: Fri Jan 13, 2023 11:25 am
Re: Semi public release of 227j
Had the
Oh yes, I changed the renderer to opengl instead of xopengl to prevent artifacting ^_^
error message. Installing libxmp4 solved the problem on my system (running on the latest Linux Mint xfce).Can't find file for package ALAudio.
Oh yes, I changed the renderer to opengl instead of xopengl to prevent artifacting ^_^
- lowenz
- OldUnreal Member
- Posts: 338
- Joined: Fri Dec 28, 2007 9:31 am
Re: Semi public release of 227j
OK now the repo on github is updated
-
- Posts: 3
- Joined: Wed Apr 12, 2023 4:13 am
Re: Semi public release of 227j
I have a very similar issue, but on the 32-bit release, using an Intel Pentium M. I had to copy the SDL binaries from the help folder, because the ones that come in Debian are too old.
Code: Select all
Starting program: /home/fierelier/.wine/drive_c/Games/Unreal Gold/System/UnrealLinux.bin
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
Using host libthread_db library "/lib/i386-linux-gnu/libthread_db.so.1".
WARNING: Not using preference directory
[Detaching after fork from child process 10256]
Program received signal SIGILL, Illegal instruction.
0xb6eac0eb in CalculateXRandRRefreshRate () from ./libSDL2-2.0.so.0
(gdb) bt
#0 0xb6eac0eb in CalculateXRandRRefreshRate () from ./libSDL2-2.0.so.0
#1 0xb6eac1d0 in SetXRandRModeInfo () from ./libSDL2-2.0.so.0
#2 0xb6eaca8a in X11_InitModes_XRandR () from ./libSDL2-2.0.so.0
#3 0xb6eacef2 in X11_InitModes () from ./libSDL2-2.0.so.0
#4 0xb6eb28d9 in X11_VideoInit () from ./libSDL2-2.0.so.0
#5 0xb6d9f366 in SDL_VideoInit_REAL () from ./libSDL2-2.0.so.0
#6 0xb6ca6088 in SDL_InitSubSystem_REAL () from ./libSDL2-2.0.so.0
#7 0xb6ca623d in SDL_Init_REAL () from ./libSDL2-2.0.so.0
#8 0xb6cb9779 in SDL_Init_DEFAULT () from ./libSDL2-2.0.so.0
#9 0xb6cc2f68 in SDL_Init () from ./libSDL2-2.0.so.0
#10 0x0804e07a in main ()
(gdb) display/i $pc
1: x/i $pc
=> 0xb6eac0eb <CalculateXRandRRefreshRate+118>: fisttpl -0x14(%ebp)
I'm excited to try this on other machines, though.
- tlk
- OldUnreal Member
- Posts: 64
- Joined: Fri May 08, 2020 6:24 am
Re: Semi public release of 227j
Pentium M is 20 years old.
Pretty sure it would be unreasonable for this project to waste effort on compatibility with hardware this old.
Pretty sure it would be unreasonable for this project to waste effort on compatibility with hardware this old.
-
- Posts: 3
- Joined: Wed Apr 12, 2023 4:13 am
Re: Semi public release of 227j
This is likely just a few compiler flags (one line of "code"), like I've described. I can play chocolate doom on this machine, watch 720p video, manage my finances, post on this forum.. I've been doing a lot to make this box a usable companion
Unfortunately, OpenGL support on this GPU is not great (slow, sometimes buggy OpenGL 1.4), and I'm limited to mostly software accelerated Linux titles. There aren't a lot. Wine's DirectDraw seems to be accelerated by OpenGL, and I've tried setting the correct values in the registry, no dice.
So here's a use-case for Windows XP, since it was talked about before: Playing old games on aged computers, especially if the computer cannot accept an OpenGL 2.1 capable GPU (a laptop).
Anyways, I was happy to see this title as another possible candidate (a Linux software-rendered game). If it just is compiler flags, it's certainly it is worth it, since there already is 32-bit support (which would imply to me some legacy friendliness).
I also did play the Windows version of this patch on this exact machine before, on XP, and it ran great. I used it because I was told it's a fix for the speed-up bug I was experiencing.
Unfortunately, OpenGL support on this GPU is not great (slow, sometimes buggy OpenGL 1.4), and I'm limited to mostly software accelerated Linux titles. There aren't a lot. Wine's DirectDraw seems to be accelerated by OpenGL, and I've tried setting the correct values in the registry, no dice.
So here's a use-case for Windows XP, since it was talked about before: Playing old games on aged computers, especially if the computer cannot accept an OpenGL 2.1 capable GPU (a laptop).
Anyways, I was happy to see this title as another possible candidate (a Linux software-rendered game). If it just is compiler flags, it's certainly it is worth it, since there already is 32-bit support (which would imply to me some legacy friendliness).
I also did play the Windows version of this patch on this exact machine before, on XP, and it ran great. I used it because I was told it's a fix for the speed-up bug I was experiencing.
- tlk
- OldUnreal Member
- Posts: 64
- Joined: Fri May 08, 2020 6:24 am
Re: Semi public release of 227j
If you read around, you'll learn that the 64 bit Linux build even requires AVX2 to run. Hence the SIGILL crash. The requirement is surely excessively steep, yet the devs aren't going to do anything about it anytime soon. I imagine it'll take time to recode something, they have their hands full as it is.
-
- Posts: 3
- Joined: Wed Apr 12, 2023 4:13 am
- REA
- OldUnreal Member
- Posts: 16
- Joined: Wed Jun 29, 2016 6:35 pm
Re: Semi public release of 227j
That issue is still happening on Unreal v227j x86 as well as UT99 v469c x64 with OpenGL and XOpenGL renderers on Linux;unfa wrote: ↑Tue Jul 26, 2022 12:54 amOne issue I've found when using the XOpenGL renderer (native 64-bit Linux version) is when transparent objects are drawn on scree, they reveal wireframes of solid objects behind them. For pain overlay this means the wireframes of everything are visible briefly:
Screenshot_20220726_024526.jpg
viewtopic.php?f=3&t=10589
The solution is indeed disabling AA;
I hope it will be fixed in an update for v227j or at the release of v277k.
- Psychomorph
- OldUnreal Member
- Posts: 19
- Joined: Wed Jul 10, 2019 12:20 pm
Re: Semi public release of 227j
I used to play normally after installing 227j, but 2 days ago I played WolfCoop (Hardcore server) again and had lots of random issues, like picking up things would randomly activate items and then few maps later am stuck in Connecting spectator mode indefinitely. Other WolfCoop servers work fine.
Today I played on a RLcoop server and also had issues. Shivaxi said it might be 227j. I reinstalled 227i and all problems were solved. Installed 227j again and the previous problems re-appear.
However, with 227i the old problems with Unreal Gold resurfaced, the terrible UI scaling with 4k and OpenGL and Dx8/9 having terrible performance (mouse skipping, low FPS, etc.). I played original Unreal with 227i for years, so those issues were not present until I switched to Gold.
So it seems both, i and j are not really usable with Unreal Gold for me. Any ideas what to try?
Today I played on a RLcoop server and also had issues. Shivaxi said it might be 227j. I reinstalled 227i and all problems were solved. Installed 227j again and the previous problems re-appear.
However, with 227i the old problems with Unreal Gold resurfaced, the terrible UI scaling with 4k and OpenGL and Dx8/9 having terrible performance (mouse skipping, low FPS, etc.). I played original Unreal with 227i for years, so those issues were not present until I switched to Gold.
So it seems both, i and j are not really usable with Unreal Gold for me. Any ideas what to try?
- Hyper
- OldUnreal Member
- Posts: 3514
- Joined: Fri Oct 11, 2002 5:41 pm
- Contact:
Re: Semi public release of 227j
227k pre-release test versions exist. These are in principle private to beta testers but ofc you can try signing up as beta tester if you are willing to test the beta builds and provide technical feedback. (With log files etc. Saying "it doesn't work" from a tester will not help the devs)Psychomorph wrote: ↑Thu Jul 13, 2023 10:45 pm I used to play normally after installing 227j, but 2 days ago I played WolfCoop (Hardcore server) again and had lots of random issues, like picking up things would randomly activate items and then few maps later am stuck in Connecting spectator mode indefinitely. Other WolfCoop servers work fine.
Today I played on a RLcoop server and also had issues. Shivaxi said it might be 227j. I reinstalled 227i and all problems were solved. Installed 227j again and the previous problems re-appear.
However, with 227i the old problems with Unreal Gold resurfaced, the terrible UI scaling with 4k and OpenGL and Dx8/9 having terrible performance (mouse skipping, low FPS, etc.). I played original Unreal with 227i for years, so those issues were not present until I switched to Gold.
So it seems both, i and j are not really usable with Unreal Gold for me. Any ideas what to try?
227k development is currently being slowed down because of personal reasons of the dev(s). So the ideal solution, a 227K release version, may not be around the corner yet.
- Psychomorph
- OldUnreal Member
- Posts: 19
- Joined: Wed Jul 10, 2019 12:20 pm
Re: Semi public release of 227j
Thanks for the info. Where do I apply for 227k testing?
- Hyper
- OldUnreal Member
- Posts: 3514
- Joined: Fri Oct 11, 2002 5:41 pm
- Contact:
Re: Semi public release of 227j
I haven't seen any official procedures for it. Your best bet is to contact the administrator(s) of this site. Either via the forum, site contact info or the OldUnreal discord. It's not guaranteed you will be given access as you will need to be trusted. But you can always try.Psychomorph wrote: ↑Sun Jul 16, 2023 9:29 pm Thanks for the info. Where do I apply for 227k testing?
- Leo T_C_K
- OldUnreal Member
- Posts: 3673
- Joined: Sat Aug 27, 2005 6:24 pm
Re: Semi public release of 227j
I just want to say here, but Psychomorph is a trustworthy person. I knew him from co-op a long way back and he's a presence at the UT Infiltration Coop community, which is really one of the most unique experiences. Though some people didn't like my presence as I wasn't a good team worker and UT INF is a "stick together" kind of thing and I would often rush to situations myself to take down monsters instead of waiting for the team or whatever.Hyper wrote: ↑Wed Jul 19, 2023 11:19 amI haven't seen any official procedures for it. Your best bet is to contact the administrator(s) of this site. Either via the forum, site contact info or the OldUnreal discord. It's not guaranteed you will be given access as you will need to be trusted. But you can always try.Psychomorph wrote: ↑Sun Jul 16, 2023 9:29 pm Thanks for the info. Where do I apply for 227k testing?
- Masterkent
- OldUnreal Member
- Posts: 1469
- Joined: Fri Apr 05, 2013 12:41 pm
Re: Semi public release of 227j
The issues you described typically happen when versions of the server and the client are not network-compatible. I've read some messages on Discord where the admins of those servers mention usage of 227j_42 and some temporary update installed over it.Psychomorph wrote: ↑Thu Jul 13, 2023 10:45 pmI used to play normally after installing 227j, but 2 days ago I played WolfCoop (Hardcore server) again and had lots of random issues, like picking up things would randomly activate items and then few maps later am stuck in Connecting spectator mode indefinitely.
227j_42 (with or without temporary updates) is not supposed to be network-compatible with the final 227j, and you can expect any glitches when trying to use an incompatible client version.
In case if a server admin uses 227j_42 without a temporary update, the compatible client versions you can safely use are:
227j_42 without updates,
227j_42 with any temporary update for it.
In case if a server admin uses 227j_42 with a temporary update, the compatible client versions you can safely use are:
227j_42 without updates,
227j_42 with the same temporary update as the one used on the server.
In both cases, the set of compatible client versions may also include 224, 225, 226, and 227i depending on the minimal version allowed by the mods and the settings used on the server.
Admins who use beta builds of 227j on their servers are encouraged to specify the exact version (including the build number and the number of the temporary update) in their server title in order to let players know that they need a special client to join and play without troubles.
I presume, it's possible to conform 227j or 227k against 227_42 and play on 227_42 servers without serious issues. However, such a client won't be compatible with normal 227j and 227k servers, so you'd need at least 2 local game installs for different servers.Psychomorph wrote: ↑Thu Jul 13, 2023 10:45 pmHowever, with 227i the old problems with Unreal Gold resurfaced, the terrible UI scaling with 4k and OpenGL and Dx8/9 having terrible performance (mouse skipping, low FPS, etc.).
- Leo T_C_K
- OldUnreal Member
- Posts: 3673
- Joined: Sat Aug 27, 2005 6:24 pm
Re: Semi public release of 227j
Speaking of that, is there a public link to 227_42? That's the version before the big changes started happening right? I don't think I even have that one saved, I do have like version 38 or something before the big change not 42.Masterkent wrote: ↑Sun Jul 23, 2023 9:39 amThe issues you described typically happen when versions of the server and the client are not network-compatible. I've read some messages on Discord where the admins of those servers mention usage of 227j_42 and some temporary update installed over it.Psychomorph wrote: ↑Thu Jul 13, 2023 10:45 pmI used to play normally after installing 227j, but 2 days ago I played WolfCoop (Hardcore server) again and had lots of random issues, like picking up things would randomly activate items and then few maps later am stuck in Connecting spectator mode indefinitely.
227j_42 (with or without temporary updates) is not supposed to be network-compatible with the final 227j, and you can expect any glitches when trying to use an incompatible client version.
In case if a server admin uses 227j_42 without a temporary update, the compatible client versions you can safely use are:
227j_42 without updates,
227j_42 with any temporary update for it.
In case if a server admin uses 227j_42 with a temporary update, the compatible client versions you can safely use are:
227j_42 without updates,
227j_42 with the same temporary update as the one used on the server.
In both cases, the set of compatible client versions may also include 224, 225, 226, and 227i depending on the minimal version allowed by the mods and the settings used on the server.
Admins who use beta builds of 227j on their servers are encouraged to specify the exact version (including the build number and the number of the temporary update) in their server title in order to let players know that they need a special client to join and play without troubles.
I presume, it's possible to conform 227j or 227k against 227_42 and play on 227_42 servers without serious issues. However, such a client won't be compatible with normal 227j and 227k servers, so you'd need at least 2 local game installs for different servers.Psychomorph wrote: ↑Thu Jul 13, 2023 10:45 pmHowever, with 227i the old problems with Unreal Gold resurfaced, the terrible UI scaling with 4k and OpenGL and Dx8/9 having terrible performance (mouse skipping, low FPS, etc.).
but gee what a mess. I thought the whole point of those patches would be that: versions would be compatible. I mean we had even 226final (an alt of 226a and not actually 226f) be conformed to work with the 227 patches via a hack (as well as 226b). But now an internal version that's being shared/played around doesn't have that. :/
or well I suppose it does but can cause desyncs..i mean it won't outright crash or something like with connecting to 226final with the 227 patches in the past (before 227h or what version introduced the compat).